Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost ; 4(5): 680-713, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2250174

RESUMEN

The 2020 Congress of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) was held virtually July 12-15, 2019, due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The congress convenes annually to discuss clinical and basic topics in hemostasis and thrombosis. Each year, the program includes State of Art (SOA) lectures given by prominent scientists. Presenters are asked to create Illustrated Capsules of their talks, which are concise illustrations with minimal explanatory text. Capsules cover major themes of the presentation, and these undergo formal peer review for inclusion in this article. Owing to the shift to a virtual congress this year, organizers reduced the program size. There were 39 SOA lectures virtually presented, and 29 capsules (9 from talks omitted from the virtual congress) were both submitted and successful in peer review, and are included in this article. Topics include the roles of the hemostatic system in inflammation, infection, immunity, and cancer, platelet function and signaling, platelet function disorders, megakaryocyte biology, hemophilia including gene therapy, phenotype tests in hemostasis, von Willebrand factor, anticoagulant factor V, computational driven discovery, endothelium, clinical and basic aspects of thrombotic microangiopathies, fibrinolysis and thrombolysis, antithrombotics in pediatrics, direct oral anticoagulant management, and thrombosis and hemostasis in pregnancy. Capsule authors invite virtual congress attendees to refer to these capsules during the live presentations and participate on Twitter in discussion. Research and Practice in Haemostasis and Thrombosis will release 2 tweets from @RPTHJournal during each presentation, using #IllustratedReview, #CoagCapsule and #ISTH2020. Readers are also welcome to utilize capsules for teaching and ongoing education.

2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 39(5): 1119-1125, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2207207

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The results of the RECOVERY trial identified dexamethasone as the first pharmacological therapy that reduces mortality in patients with COVID-19. The aim of this paper is to conduct a systematic literature review on safety and efficacy of pulse glucocorticoid therapy for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-CoronaVirus (CoV), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 infections and describe a case-series of COVID-19 patients treated with off-label pulse doses of methylprednisolone. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review on safety and efficacy of pulse therapy for betacoronaviridae infections as described in the protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020190183). All consecutive patients admitted to Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia or Guastalla Hospital with COVID-19 between March 1st and April 30th, 2020 and treated with methylprednisolone 1 gram/day for at least three days were included in the case series. A retrospective review of available computed tomography (CT) scan and chest x-ray was performed independently by two radiologists blinded to clinical data, and discordances were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Twenty papers were included for SARS, but only two were comparative and were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Likewise, eleven papers were included for COVID-19, four of which were comparative and were considered for the primary outcome analysis. Included studies for both SARS and COVID-19 are mostly retrospective and highly heterogeneous, with lethality ranging from 0% to 100% and ICU admission rate ranging from 9% to 100%. Fourteen patients were included in our case series, 7 males and 7 females. CONCLUSIONS: No randomised controlled trial is available yet for corticosteroids pulse-therapy defined as at least ≥500mg/day methylprednisolone in patients with emerging coronavirus pneumonia. Lethality among our cohort is high (4/14), but this finding should be interpreted with caution due to the fact that in our setting pulse-steroids were used in patients not eligible for other treatments because of comorbidities or as rescue therapy. The incidence of steroid-related adverse events seems low in our cohort. The quality of the evidence on glucocorticoid pulse-therapy in SARS, MERS and COVID-19 is poor. Randomised controlled trials are greatly needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Coronaviridae , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Discover Psychology ; 2(1), 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1843237

RESUMEN

The present research investigates the possible causes of resistance to vaccination against the COVID-19 virus. A significant percentage of different countries' populations is refractory to being vaccinated (i.e., in October 2021, in Italy, 20% aged 40–50 years old). A 92-item questionnaire was filled in by a sample of 613 subjects, of which 50.4% said they were against COVID-19 vaccines (63.1% female). Guided by the hypothesis that emotionality constitutes a basis of pre-reflective judgment, items relating to fear, anger and anguish were introduced in the survey. The subjects compiled the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale. The differences between the means of the two samples evaluated with the Student test show that it is, above all, the underlying anguish that constitutes the primary discriminant between the two samples. No Vax mainly considers external the sources of anguish, while Yes Vax sources of anguish appear more internal. From this result an interpretation is advanced: it seems more difficult for No Vax to trust authority recommendations/obligations to get vaccinated because anguish is located just outside the one's body, where Authority dominates. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44202-022-00038-2.

4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(8): 1926-1928, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-245715

RESUMEN

A high incidence of thrombotic events has been reported in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We report 3 clinical cases of patients in Italy with COVID-19 who developed abdominal viscera infarction, demonstrated by computed tomography.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Infarto/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Trombosis/complicaciones , Abdomen/irrigación sanguínea , Abdomen/patología , Abdomen/virología , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Infarto/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto/terapia , Infarto/virología , Italia , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Neumonía Viral/virología , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/terapia , Trombosis/virología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Vísceras/irrigación sanguínea , Vísceras/efectos de los fármacos , Vísceras/patología , Vísceras/virología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA